将隐式 ExecutionContext 传递给包含的对象/调用的方法

我正在使用 Scala 2.10 futures 创建一个异步库。库的构造函数采用一系列实现特定特征的用户定义对象，然后库类上的方法将一些数据逐一发送到用户定义的对象中。我希望用户提供ExecutionContext用于设置主实例时的异步操作，然后根据需要将该上下文传递到用户定义的对象中。简化（伪？）代码：

case class Response(thing: String)

class LibraryObject(stack: Seq[Processor])(implicit context: ExecutionContext) {
  def entryPoint(data: String): Future[Response] = {
    val response = Future(Response(""))
    stack.foldLeft(response) { (resp, proc) => proc.process(data, resp) }
  }
}

trait Processor {
  def process(data: String, resp: Future[Response]): Future[Response]
}

它可能会这样使用：

class ThingProcessor extends Processor {
  override def process(data: String, response: Future[Response]) = {
    response map { _.copy(thing = "THE THING") }
  }
}

class PassThroughProcessor extends Processor {
  override def process(request: Request, response: Future[Response]) = {
    response
  }
}

object TheApp extends App {
  import ExecutionContext.Implicits.global

  val stack = List(
    new ThingProcessor,
    new PassThroughProcessor
  )
  val libObj = new LibraryObject(stack)

  val futureResponse = libObj.entryPoint("http://some/url")

  // ...
}

我收到编译错误ThingProcessor:

找不到隐式 ExecutionContext，要么自己需要一个，要么导入ExecutionContext.Implicits.global

我的问题是，我如何隐式提供ExecutionContext that LibraryObject必须是用户定义的对象（ThingProcessor and PassThroughProcessor）或他们的方法，而不会让用户（将编写类）担心它 - 也就是说，我更希望用户这样做not必须输入：

class MyFirstProcessor(implicit context: ExecutionContext)

or

override def process(...)(implicit context: ExecutionContext) = { ... }

隐式作用域包括基类的伴生对象和类型参数。

或者，library.submit(new library.Processor { def process() ... })。

这可行，但不是我的第一个想法，这是更聪明的：

import concurrent._
import concurrent.duration._

class Library(implicit xc: ExecutionContext = ExecutionContext.global) {
  trait Processor {
    implicit val myxc: ExecutionContext = xc
    def process(i: Future[Int]): Future[Int]
  }

  def submit(p: Processor) = p process future(7)
}

object Test extends App {
  val library = new Library
  val p = new library.Processor {
    def process(i: Future[Int]) = for (x <- i) yield 2 * x
  }
  val res = library submit p
  val z = Await result (res, 10.seconds)
  Console println z
}

Update:

import concurrent._
import concurrent.duration._
import java.util.concurrent.Executors

class Library()(implicit xc: ExecutionContext = ExecutionContext.global) {
  trait Processor {
    implicit val myxc: ExecutionContext = xc
    def process(i: Future[Int]): Future[Int]
  }

  def submit(p: Processor) = p process future(7)
}

object ctx {
  val xc = ExecutionContext fromExecutorService Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor
}
object library1 extends Library
object library2 extends Library()(ctx.xc)
object p extends library1.Processor {
  def process(i: Future[Int]) = for (x <- i) yield 2 * x
}
object q extends library2.Processor {
  def process(i: Future[Int]) = for (x <- i) yield 3 * x
}

object Test extends App {
  val res = library1 submit p
  //val oops = library2 submit p
  //val oops = library1 submit q
  val z = Await result (res, 10.seconds)
  Console println z
  Console println (Await result (library2 submit q, 10.seconds))
  ctx.xc.shutdownNow()
}

这并不难：

class Library(implicit xc: ExecutionContext = ExecutionContext.global) {

  def submit(p: Processor): Future[Int] = p dueProcess future(7)
}
trait Processor {
  implicit var myxc: ExecutionContext = _
  def dueProcess(i: Future[Int])(implicit xc: ExecutionContext) = {
    myxc = xc
    process(i)
  }
  protected def process(i: Future[Int]): Future[Int]
}

object ctx {
  val xc = ExecutionContext fromExecutorService Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor
}
object Test extends App {
  def db() = Console println (new Throwable().getStackTrace mkString ("TRACE [\n  ", "\n  ", "\n]"))
  val library = new Library()(ctx.xc)
  val p = new Processor {
    protected def process(i: Future[Int]) = for (x <- i) yield { db(); 2 * x }
  }
  val res = library submit p
  val z = Await result (res, 10.seconds)
  Console println z
  ctx.xc.shutdownNow()
}